BRAP is DPIIT’s collaborative framework with States and Union Territories for improving business regulation and government service delivery through specific reforms and evidence-based assessment.
Help
Frequently asked questions
Plain-language answers based on the supplied BRAP, SWS, DBRAP, SRS and FRS materials.
State BRAP, Single Window System (SWS) and District BRAP (DBRAP). They share a common lifecycle but use different applicability, evidence and district rules.
The secure portal is intended for authorised roles such as administrators, State Nodal Officers, reviewers, approvers and other designated assessment users. Access is role- and jurisdiction-based.
The State Nodal Officer submits DBRAP evidence and user data per district. The supplied requirements explicitly avoid introducing a separate District User role.
No. The District BRAP guidebook states that State Governments develop, operate or update portals and online systems and issue the required notifications.
In addition to reform-specific evidence, the generic checklist covers a functional system URL, availability or uptime confirmation, validation access, live demonstration and supporting screenshots, walkthroughs or notifications.
Submissions follow an auditable lifecycle from draft through review and approval, with clarification, rejection and return branches. Each transition is recorded in history.
The supplied implementation rules treat Yes and NA1 as full marks, No as zero, and exclude NA2 and Withdrawn from the achievable score. No partial scoring is applied at reform-status level.
Not necessarily. Evidence and final or composite scores are separate. When an assessment scheme requires user feedback, the final score remains pending until that input is available.
No. Authenticated dashboard records are illustrative sample data for design review. Production values must come from approved portal services and the live database.